# FILE NAME: 00000351.soc
# TITLE: Should we have a new nuclear power station? [53dbfd717b5933043dc8056c3ea6cef4]
# DESCRIPTION: 
# DATA TYPE: soc
# MODIFICATION TYPE: original
# RELATES TO: 
# RELATED FILES: 
# PUBLICATION DATE: 2025-10-12
# MODIFICATION DATE: 2025-10-12
# NUMBER ALTERNATIVES: 4
# NUMBER VOTERS: 5
# NUMBER UNIQUE ORDERS: 4
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 1: Statement 1 - The majority of the group thought that nuclear power was needed for energy security, however we did think that it was a highly political issue and that the public should be involved in the decision. Some thought that the benefits outweighed the risks, others thought the opposite.
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 2: Statement 2 - In general, the group was in favour of nuclear power, although with reservations. We had different opinions on whether to build a new power station or not, but overall felt that the climate change issues outweigh the dangers of a new station. We thought that the people in the vicinity should have a say in whether it should be built or not, as it is a hot political topic and could cause uproar. However, we do think that it is a vital and much needed source of energy, and should be researched further.
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 3: Statement 3 - There is a strong argument for building a new nuclear power station, and nuclear power is a key part of the energy mix in the future. There are benefits and risks to the environment and community, and the public should be involved in the decision.
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 4: Statement 4 - The group, in general, was in favour of nuclear power, although with reservations. We had different opinions on whether to build a new power station or not, but overall felt that the climate change issues outweigh the dangers of a new station. We thought that the people in the vicinity should have a say in whether it should be built or not, as it is a hot political topic and could cause uproar.
2: 2,4,1,3
1: 4,3,2,1
1: 2,1,3,4
1: 3,1,2,4